News & Articles

When couples enter therapy, they often arrive with different ideas about what they want to change. Sometimes these differences are subtle, other times they're stark enough to make the relationship feel impossible. A therapist working with these couples faces a unique challenge: how do you help two people move forward when they may not even agree on which direction to go?

Solution focused brief therapy offers some intriguing approaches to this dilemma. This therapeutic method, developed in the 1980s in Milwaukee, emphasizes building solutions rather than dissecting problems. When applied to couples, it focuses on what partners want their future to look like rather than endlessly analyzing what went wrong in the past.

The Core Philosophy

Solution focused therapy operates on several key principles that shape how therapists work with couples. The approach assumes that if something isn't broken, there's no need to fix it. If something is working, do more of it. And if something isn't working, try something different. Small changes can lead to bigger ones, and the solution to a problem doesn't necessarily require understanding the problem's origins.

Perhaps most importantly, this approach views the future as something that can be shaped and negotiated. People aren't locked into patterns based on their history or circumstances. Instead, they can actively design where they want to go.

When working with couples specifically, therapists must maintain careful neutrality. They cannot take sides or favor one partner's perspective over the other. They need to validate both views simultaneously and build a working relationship with each person. The sessions require clear structure because the more people in the room, the easier it is for conversations to devolve into blame and accusation.

What Does "Preferred Future" Mean?

The term "preferred future" refers to what clients want to see happen with the help of therapy. It's not about what the therapist thinks should happen or what conventional wisdom suggests. Instead, it centers entirely on the clients' own desires and values.

This isn't a simple information gathering exercise where the therapist asks what someone wants and writes it down. Rather, it's a collaborative creative process where therapist and clients together construct a meaningful direction for the work ahead.

In couples therapy, the extent to which partners agree or disagree about their preferred future becomes crucial. Sometimes couples share a common vision. Sometimes they have different ideas that don't necessarily conflict. And sometimes their visions directly oppose each other, creating what therapists call a "disagreement on direction."

When Partners Share a Vision

The simplest scenario occurs when both partners roughly agree on what they want. They might both desire better communication, more laughter, improved intimacy, or greater mutual respect. When this common ground exists, traditional therapeutic techniques can be applied relatively straightforwardly.

Even within a shared vision, each partner might focus on different specific goals or skills. One might work on showing more respect for what matters to the other, while the second focuses on changes in how they express affection. The overall direction remains shared, but each person chooses their own way to contribute. Partners can then support each other in these individual projects, which itself strengthens their relationship.

When Directions Differ But Don't Conflict

Occasionally, each partner has their own vision of the preferred future that, while not directly shared, remains acceptable to the other and compatible with both their ideas. This arrangement is less common but can still be worked with meaningfully.

The relationship develops indirectly through each partner connecting to and supporting the other's proposed direction. Though they're working on somewhat separate visions, the mutual support itself becomes a factor that enhances their bond.

When Visions Clash

The biggest challenge emerges when partners' directions fundamentally conflict. One wants children, the other doesn't. One wants to end the relationship, the other wants to save it. One wants to relocate for a job opportunity, the other refuses to move. These situations test a therapist's ability to remain neutral and maintain openness to both perspectives.

Even when therapists personally resonate with one partner's position over the other, they must intentionally validate both viewpoints. This requires conscious effort and regular self reflection, often with the help of supervision.

One approach to these conflicts involves finding the intersection between the two preferred futures. Even when partners' overall visions differ dramatically, there's usually some common ground, however small. A couple disagreeing about whether to stay together might both recognize the need to improve their communication, whether that's for salvaging the relationship or managing a respectful separation.

Another technique involves adopting a "both/and" attitude rather than forcing an "either/or" choice. Instead of eliminating options, the therapist explores all of them carefully, placing them imaginatively side by side. Detailed descriptions of each possibility combined with questions about how each partner would respond can reduce the perceived dichotomy.

Some therapists use a method called the Tetralemma, which expands beyond two options to include: option A, option B, neither A nor B, both A and B simultaneously, and sometimes none of these. This assignment leads couples to create variants that combine opposing options or discover completely new alternatives, opening space for truly original solutions.

Other Strategies for Disagreement

When partners can't agree on a direction, the focus can shift to examining how they're functioning within the disagreement itself. Not by analyzing why they disagree or dwelling on the disagreement, but by capturing and developing even small resources to build upon.

Therapists might explore how partners are managing despite the disagreement, whether there are things they can agree on, what benefits the disagreement has brought, and what negative consequences it's created. These conversations give partners space to express difficulty while potentially offering clues for later negotiation.

Temporal aspects can also provide useful perspectives. How much longer can they continue in disagreement? For some couples, agreeing on a clear timeframe helps. One partner might need time to make a decision while the other needs certainty about when that decision will come. The timeframe prevents one partner from creating pressure while the other gets stuck, creating space for better, more responsible decisions.

Sometimes partners need to test whether their relationship is worth the effort to improve or whether it's too damaged to sustain. Rather than answering this question theoretically or through expert opinion, therapists can structure this testing through practical exploration and experiments between sessions, where the relationship's dynamics reveal themselves in action.

When Standard Approaches Don't Work

In some situations, individual sessions become necessary. Therapists must decide whether to refer one or both partners to colleagues for individual work while keeping couple therapy open as a possibility, or whether to work individually with one partner, which typically closes the door on future couple work with that therapist.

The general principle therapists follow is to start by trying to formulate a common vision of both partners' preferred future. Only when this proves impossible do they focus on alternative approaches for working with different or conflicting visions.

The Art of the Conversation

Negotiating preferred futures in couples therapy isn't about memorizing clever questions or following a rigid script. It's about developing conversations that help clients gradually clarify what matters to them and what direction makes sense for their relationship.

This work strengthens the therapeutic alliance, increases hope that therapy will help, and provides clear direction for the work ahead. Even when partners arrive with seemingly irreconcilable differences, skilled therapists can often find pathways forward, whether that means discovering unexpected common ground, learning to support divergent goals, or helping couples make clear decisions about their relationship's future.

The emphasis on preferred futures rather than problem analysis represents a fundamental shift in how therapy can work. Instead of getting mired in who did what wrong and why, couples can focus their energy on what they want to create together, or at minimum, how they want to move forward even if that means moving apart.